1. For each video and article list/discuss the
key concepts you learned.
Aesthetics: Philosophy of the Arts:
According to Friedrich Von Schiller, Aesthetics was
designed to, "Imbue students' appreciation for and understanding for the
arts." Aesthetics is always linked to society as a whole and the
foundation for aesthetics was not set until the 18th century in England, with
the absence of aesthetics prior to this time. Before aesthetics in art,
especially before the 15th century, art and beauty was consumed by love and
loyalty to God and religion. The Neoclassical aesthetics is that of
proportion, symmetry, harmony, and order. The 20th century aesthetics focused
on innovation and the challenge to distort art in a creative way and today art
can be repeated anywhere as a result in advancement in technology and
aesthetics will likely take a turn because of it.
Not all philosophers confine to these theories of aesthetics though, some even
take a position such as George Dickie's which states art could be anything that
the institution of the art world designated as such. Art can take many forms
such as music, which Schopenhauer argues is the finest of arts which appeals to
figurative and imaginary in meaning.
CARTA: Evolutionary Origins of Art and
Aesthetics: Neurobiology, Neurology and Art and Aesthetics
The speakers in this video discuss the brain and science in relation to art.
They point out how different cultures have different forms of art because the
brain develops differently in different locations. The brain itself has at
least thirty areas which are involved with visual processing and certain areas
of the brain become excited when interactive with certain qualities in art. Changeux points out that brain development is
the key to art; people’s individual emotions, experiences, and what they have
seen changes their perception of art. Changeux listed four definitions to art:
distance, language, efficacy, and art history. Ramachandran discusses that each
individual is different through scientific findings; art and science meet in
the brain. Through this, distortment is seen as beautiful in its own way
instead of hideous.
CNN - What
the brain draws from: Art and neuroscience
This article goes into detail more on the brain and its perception of
art, and neuroesthetics as a field. The article discusses many features of art
which art not present in nature, such as lines, or the depth of a shadow, or
even the location of a reflection. In nature there are no black lines outlining
objects, yet our brains readily recognize shapes or even faces in art made by
lines. Two dimensional works of art appear three dimensional by using shadows
and contrasts in light that are entirely unnatural yet appeal to certain areas
of the brain that allow us to perceive it in three dimensions. Colors that aren’t
present can even be shown in works of art as Zeki proved using shadows of red
light to make a complementary cyan color appear. The brain is extremely complex
and studying works of art allow us to understand the brain better as well, not
just the art.
2. Which philosopher's theory on aesthetics do you feel is
most important? Be sure to mention the philosophers name, era (time in
history), and contribution to the aesthetic theory in your response.
I appreciate Friedrich Von Schiller’s
theory on aesthetics that the role of aesthetics is to imbue students
appreciation for and understanding of art. Without the appreciation and understanding
that aesthetics brings to art, and the qualities that it gives, we remove the
meaning and significance of many iconic works. In the 18th century,
Schiller helped understand art and aesthetics and made great contributions to
art in education, teaching that understanding aesthetics makes us more human.
3. What do you think about Changeux and Ramachandran scientific
view of aesthetics and art? What was the most interesting fact you discovered
from each speakers lecture?
I
appreciate Changeux and Ramachandran’s scientific view and approach to art.
This view is crucial to understanding art and the human brain and they were
able to look in depth into why we are drawn to specific works of art and what
qualities draw us to them. I like Ramachandran’s example using an autistic
child, a healthy child, and Vincent Van Gogh and their drawing of horses in
comparison to eachother to explain how the brain works when creating art, that
each artist’s brain chose to see the horse in a different way and focus on
different visual cues. I enjoyed Changeux’s relationship of the brain and art.
Changeux focused on brain development and that different environments and
developments cause the brain to interpret works of art differently and create
different types of art.
4. How do the videos and article relate to the readings in the
text?
The
videos and article seemed to follow along with the book well. The book went in
depth about art and aesthetics and what causes us as humans to appreciate art
and the different themes. The videos then described aesthetics as well and went
into detail about the human brain and brain development and used a scientific approach
to analyze art and the brain and their relationship to one another.
5. What is your opinion of the films and article? How do they
add depth to understanding of the topics in your reading in the text?
Personally, I enjoy reading and gain a greater
understanding of topics by being able to visually study them and re-read
important segments. The videos we watched were often so boring I’d have to
re-watch the same parts of a video numerous times because I could not get
myself to pay attention to it; I spent more energy trying to get myself just to
pay attention than I did actually gaining anything from the videos. This aside,
though, the information in the videos was interesting and a great compliment to
the readings to give more examples and different explanations of these topics.
The article, I thought, was extremely interesting and I enjoyed reading the
article and comparing the descriptions of lines and faces to compare art to the
natural world.